Mostrando entradas con la etiqueta Twitter. Mostrar todas las entradas
Mostrando entradas con la etiqueta Twitter. Mostrar todas las entradas

jueves, 31 de mayo de 2012

Twitter, Facebook Join the List of In-Car Distractions

Drivers, start your engines—and log in to your Wi-Fi. Just be sure to put the car in park if you’re going to tweet or update your Facebook status. That’s essentially the auto industry’s response to government warnings that a proliferation of models equipped with Web access and other distractions will cause a spike in accidents.

As Audi (NSU), Nissan (NSANY), General Motors (GM), and Ford (F) make a selling point of in-car Internet and social networks, U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood is pushing new federal guidelines to discourage their use. The government says carmakers should avoid any feature that would take a driver’s eyes off the road for more than two seconds; interactive devices should only work when the car is stopped. “We don’t have to choose between safety and technology,” LaHood says in an e-mail, “but while these devices may offer consumers new tools and features, automakers have a responsibility to ensure they don’t divert a driver’s attention.”

Photograph by Charles Maraia/Getty Images

The guidelines are just suggestions—they don’t have the force of law and stop short of setting limits on what cars can include. That’s allowed automakers to praise LaHood’s efforts to protect drivers while continuing to develop the features the government is concerned about. The industry’s creative argument: The new gadgets are safer for drivers than fumbling with smartphones while behind the wheel. “They’re going to do those things whether it’s through the vehicle or through a handheld device that they bring with them in the car,” says Wade Newton, a spokesman for the Washington-based Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers, whose members include BMW (BMW) and Volkswagen (VOW), “and those are devices that were never designed to be used while in an auto.”

The new Cadillac XTS sedan will include an iPad-like touchscreen and limited voice commands. “When you look at the average car, and we’re guilty of it and so are all of our competitors, you’ve got too many buttons,” says GM Chief Executive Officer Daniel Akerson. Ford, whose MyFord Touch and MyLincoln Touch infotainment systems were panned by Consumer Reports magazine for being too complicated to use, says it’s devising new, easier ways for drivers to get on their favorite sites—when the car isn’t moving. “Our engineers have?…?been working with Facebook engineers to develop unique and safer ways of integrating the car experience with Facebook,” Jay Cooney, a Ford spokesman, says in an e-mail.

No matter how easy they are to use, features such as these “only serve to feed an already ravenous appetite for distracted driving,” says Rob Reynolds, executive director of FocusDriven, which has pressed for tougher penalties for drivers who text or talk on cell phones while driving and now backs putting restrictions on in-car Internet. That’s not likely to happen. LaHood has said that for now he’s satisfied with the voluntary guidelines and won’t push for federal rules with teeth. Instead, he’s hoping to put pressure on car companies with a series of public-service videos featuring people whose family members were killed in crashes caused by distracted drivers. There are plenty: In 2010, according to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 3,092 people—nearly 10 percent of those killed on the nation’s highways—died in accidents related to drivers who were paying more attention to their screens than to the road.

The bottom line: New federal guidelines ask automakers not to include features that distract drivers—but the industry doesn’t have to follow them.


View the original article here

sábado, 2 de julio de 2011

FTC Antitrust Probe of Twitter

July 01, 2011, 2:58 PM EDT By Jeff Bliss and Brian Womack

(Updates with Gavil comment in eighth paragraph and software consultant comment in 13th paragraph.)

July 1 (Bloomberg) -- The U.S. Federal Trade Commission has begun contacting software makers as part of a preliminary inquiry into whether Twitter Inc.’s business practices harm competition, two people familiar with the matter said.

The agency is responding to complaints that Twitter is making it harder for some software developers to design applications that run in concert with the company’s service, said one of the people, who asked not to be identified because the matter hasn’t been made public.

The agency has been taking a more active role in examining the behavior of large Internet companies in recent months. Last week, Google Inc., the world’s biggest Internet-search provider, said it had received a subpoena from the FTC regarding a broad antitrust probe into its dominance.

Peter Kaplan, an FTC spokesman, declined to comment, as did Sean Garrett, a spokesman for San Francisco-based Twitter.

Twitter, which allows people to communicate in 140- character messages, has seen its usage surge since the company was founded four years ago. The website is now used by 13 percent of U.S. adults online, up from 8 percent in November, as more older Americans embrace the service, according to a report last month by the Pew Research Center in Washington.

Twitter, competing with social-networking service Facebook Inc., is trying to improve its products and attract more users and advertisers. Last year, the company added more features that matched what independent Twitter developers were already doing, such as applications for smartphones.

Nature of Accusations

Considering the nature of the accusations and the lack of strong legal precedent, the FTC would be on the boundaries of the law if the agency decided to bring a case against Twitter, one person familiar with the matter said.

Still, the complaints “sound a lot like some of the allegations that were leveled at Microsoft,” said Andrew Gavil, a Howard University law professor in Washington. Microsoft Corp. eventually signed a 10-year agreement allowing the government to monitor its business.

One developer, UberMedia, said in an e-mailed statement yesterday that “we have been contacted by the FTC and we intend to fully comply with their request for information.”

The Pasadena, California-based company didn’t say that the probe was targeting Twitter.

Independent Developer

On its website, UberMedia describes itself as the leading independent developer of applications that help users find and communicate with one another on Twitter.

In February, UberMedia Chief Executive Officer Bill Gross said in a blog posting that Twitter had temporarily shut off the access of several UberMedia applications to the Twitter service, accusing the developer of violating a contract.

“It was enough of a shot across the bow, so it got the attention of not only UberMedia but the entire developer community,” said Mark Evans, a Toronto-based social-media strategist whose clients include independent Twitter software developers.

Twitter has a legitimate goal of wanting to generate revenue by expanding its product’s features, Evans said. The trick will be that in doing so, it doesn’t “kill that developer ecosystem” drawing users to Twitter, he said.

Business Insider reported on the FTC inquiry earlier yesterday.

--With assistance from Sara Forden in Washington. Editors: Leslie Hoffecker, Laurie Asseo

To contact the reporters on this story: Jeff Bliss in Washington at jbliss@bloomberg.net; Brian Womack in San Francisco at bwomack1@bloomberg.net

To contact the editors responsible for this story: Mark Silva at msilva34@bloomberg.net; Tom Giles at tgiles5@bloomberg.net


View the original article here