Apple Deals for Cloud Service Complete

June 02, 2011, 10:01 PM EDT By Adam Satariano and Andy Fixmer

June 2 (Bloomberg) -- Apple Inc. reached an agreement with Universal Music Group, the largest record label, setting the stage for its new service to let users access song libraries on multiple devices, two people with knowledge of the talks said.

The new music service, enabling customers to store their music on Apple’s servers, will be previewed on June 6 by Chief Executive Officer Steve Jobs at Apple’s annual developers conference in San Francisco, said the people, who declined to be identified because the deals aren’t public.

Apple’s deal with Vivendi SA’s Universal Music, whose artists include Lady Gaga and U2, follows agreements with Sony Corp.’s music unit, Warner Music Group Corp. and EMI Group Ltd. By moving the files into the so-called cloud, songs will be available on devices such as the iPhone and iPad without users having to plug in and synchronize the gadgets. Instead, tracks can be streamed from anywhere with a Web connection.

To start, the service will be available only for songs that have been purchased through iTunes, said the people. Later in the year, Apple plans to introduce a $25-per-year plan so music purchased outside iTunes can be stored on its servers and streamed through an Internet connection.

Under the agreements with the labels, revenue from the cloud service will be split between Apple and the music companies. Apple will collect 30 percent, while the record labels will get 58 percent and owners of publishing rights will get 12 percent, the people said.

Earlier this week, Cupertino, California-based Apple said it would discuss its new iCloud service at the developers conference. The company also will talk about upgrades to its software for Mac personal computers and mobile devices.

Cnet.com earlier reported Apple had reached an agreement with Universal Music Group.

--Editors: Jillian Ward, Nick Turner

To contact the reporters on this story: Adam Satariano in San Francisco at asatariano1@bloomberg.net; Andrew Fixmer in Los Angeles at afixmer@bloomberg.net

To contact the editors responsible for this story: Thomas Giles at tgiles5@bloomberg.net; Anthony Palazzo at apalazzo@bloomberg.net

View the original article here

Apple's Deals May Transform Digital Music

Illustration by QuickHoney

By Brad Stone and Andy Fixmer

(Corrects spelling of Russ Crupnick)

Compared with buying e-books, building a digital music collection is a hassle. E-books zip directly to reading devices like the Kindle and Nook and are backed up "in the cloud"—on the servers of Amazon.com (AMZN) and Barnes & Noble (BKS). A digital song, on the other hand, is typically downloaded to a PC and must then be manually transferred to an iPod or mobile phone. If you lose your Kindle, you can always download an e-book again; if the PC crashes or the iPod falls into the bathtub, the song goes down with it.

Moving music to the cloud has been an elusive goal for big tech companies and their music industry counterparts, until now. In the past two months, Amazon and Google (GOOG) have unveiled cloud music services, albeit to mixed reviews and indifference from consumers. These new services let users upload their music collections into so-called digital lockers on the Internet and stream the songs they own to a variety of devices. Both are limited, because neither Google nor Amazon could reach an accommodation with music labels. Label executives say they are negotiating aggressively to make sure they profit from the shift to the cloud. It may be the last opportunity to stem rampant piracy and years of plummeting sales.

Apple (AAPL), the reigning heavyweight of the music business, may have solved this cloud conundrum. It has reached agreements with three of the four major music labels and is close to reaching terms with the fourth, Universal Music, according to people with knowledge of these deals but who can't speak on the record because the talks are private. The company could preview its cloud plans as early as June at Apple's annual Worldwide Developers Conference in San Francisco. The music industry will be watching to see whether Steve Jobs & Co. have discovered a way to quell the deep anxieties of the music biz while creating a flexible, easy-to-use service that isn't too expensive. "With a big enough checkbook, anyone can get a deal with the record labels," says Michael Robertson, founder of an unlicensed cloud music locker called Mp3tunes, which is embroiled in a lawsuit with EMI. "The question is whether Apple's cloud music service will be consumer-friendly." Apple declined to comment.

Apple's music service, which Engadget and other tech blogs are already calling iCloud, might well represent the future of recorded music. Armed with licenses from the music labels and publishers, Apple will be able to scan customers' digital music libraries in iTunes and quickly mirror their collections on its own servers, say three people briefed on the talks. If the sound quality of a particular song on a user's hard drive isn't good enough, Apple will be able to replace it with a higher-quality version. Users of the service will then be able to stream, whenever they want, their songs and albums directly to PCs, iPhones, iPads, and perhaps one day even cars. And the music industry gets a chance at the next best thing after selling shrink-wrapped CDs: monthly subscription fees, a la Netflix (NFLX) and the cable companies. "We will come to a point in the not-so-distant future when we'll look back on the 99? download as anachronistic as cassette tapes or 8-tracks," says Russ Crupnick, a music analyst at NPD Group.

While it may be a huge shift, it won't be free. Apple no doubt has paid dearly for any cloud music licenses, and it's unclear how much of those costs it will eat or pass on to consumers. One possibility would be to bundle an iCloud digital locker into Apple's MobileMe online service, which currently costs $99 a year and synchronizes contacts, e-mail, Web bookmarks, and other user data across multiple devices. Users will be able to store their entire music collections in the cloud—even if they obtained some songs illegally. That would finally give the labels a way to claw out some money on pirated music.

View the original article here